Online safety legislation is “unsatisfactory” and “uneven”, the science secretary has said as he expressed hopes for parliament to learn to legislate faster on the issue.
Peter Kyle said he had given a “very personal commitment to making sure that everybody, particularly people with vulnerabilities and every child is vulnerable, has protection”, after Ian Russell, whose daughter killed herself after viewing harmful content on social media, told Keir Starmer the UK is “going backwards” on online safety.
Russell, who is also the chair of the Molly Rose Foundation (MRF), said in his letter to the prime minister on Saturday that regulator Ofcom’s implementation of the Online Safety Act has been a “disaster”.
The Online Safety Act is the UK’s first major legislation to regulate social media, search engine, messaging, gaming, dating, pornography and filesharing platforms.
The legislation gave Ofcom the power to fine firms that fail to meet these duties – potentially up to billions of pounds for the largest sites – and in serious cases can seek clearance to block access to a site in the UK.
However Russell said unless there are changes to the legislation, “the streams of life-sucking content seen by children will soon become torrents: a digital disaster”.
Sharing his frustrations with the act, Kyle told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “The frustration I have is that the bill was conceived with a whole set of principles, including taking down illegal [content] but also tackling the area where the volume of interaction could have a negative impact – legal but harmful.
“Kemi Badenoch, when she was running for leader at that exact point that the bill was passing through parliament, said that this was legislating for hurt feelings.
“That entire bit of the bill was taken out, so I have inherited a landscape where we have a very uneven, unsatisfactory legislative settlement.”
He added: “I want to focus on getting all the powers I can have implemented, that will happen in the course of this year. I’m very open-minded and I have said publicly we will have to legislate into the future again. We can’t just wait every decade or so and do a big bang of online harm legislation and also other bits of technological legislation.
“We need to get parliament more into the cycle of updating the law because things like deepfakes, for example, come down the line and in three months they are developed, designed, deployed and they are impacting society.”
Related: ‘Would love to see her faked’: the dark world of sexual deepfakes – and the women fighting back
Story continues
Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, announced its plans earlier this week to scrap its longstanding factchecking programme in favour of a community notes system.
The science secretary said British law has not changed and tech companies must still comply with it, and claimed Mark Zuckerberg’s comments was “an American statement for American service users”.
He appeared to defend Zuckerberg pointing to other comments in which the Meta chief had “mentioned the need to take down illegal activity” and “keep children safe online”.
Meta, which also owns WhatsApp and Threads, plans to “work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more”, Zuckerberg said in his statemnet.
He said Meta would also “get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender” that were “out of touch with mainstream discourse”.
Kyle, the science secretary said: “There is one thing that has not changed and that is the law of this land and the determination of this government to keep everyone safe.”
He added: “Access to the British society and economy is a privilege, it is not a right. If you come and operate in this country you abide by the law, and the law says illegal content must be taken down.”